patching...
Update: Time to Like the Ladue-Frontenac Patch Facebook page. Help get us to 500 next. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Prop 1: 49 cent Tax Levy Goes to the Voters Tuesday, April 3

Voters will decide the fate of Ladue School District for years to come.

 

Drive through the city of Ladue, Creve Coeur, Olivette or other communities feeding into the Ladue School District and you will see more campaign signs than tulips blooming in this unseasonably warm, mild spring. On the ballot Tuesday, April 3 is the .49 cent tax increase, dubbed Proposition 1.

If this proposition passes, Ladue tax payers will pay .49 cents for every $100 of assessed valuation. That figures to be $465.50 for a half million dollar home; and $931.00 annually for a million dollar home.

Passions are riding high on both sides of this issue, with the Take Back the Ladue Schools campaign and with Commit2Ladue.org.

The Take Back Ladue Committee has been very firm in their opposition. They previously worked to defeat a previous tax levy initiative several years ago.

Those on the no side feel strongly the district's finances are in disarray and they think its time for new leadership. Their side was strongly opposed to the purchase of the Westminster Christian Academy and the construction of the Ladue Early Childhood Center.

The LEEC cost the district nearly $18 million to build and the overall West Campus purchase was close to $30 million. Those on the pro side state the purchase of the land and facilities is very necessary for future growth of the district.

Some on the NO side feel the district should better manage their money, and make more appropriate cuts in staff and programs. The cost of providing transportation to district children and offering Spanish as a second language to elementary students has been a controversial issue.

The NO committee enlisted the support of high-profile political activitist Phyllis Schlafly, head of the national Eagle Forum to pen a letter urging district residents to vote against the proposition. Schlafly has resided in Ladue for 17 years.

Ladue is just one of four public districts in the state of Missouri designated a “Premier” school. Ladue has the lowest tax rate ($2.75) of any school in St. Louis County.

Ladue is the last standing district to be under $3.00 in the entire county.

Ladue spends $12,992.41 per pupil (as calculated by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education using a formula consistent across all districts.) That is less than Clayton, the highest at $18,065.88 and other comparables: Webster Groves, and Pattonville. Only Kirkwood is slightly less at $12,295.80 per pupil.

Ladue's excellence in and out of the class room extends to athletics, music, drama and other student based activities.

More than 90 percent of Ladue’s graduates have gone onto four year colleges all 58 years, many doing post graduate work at some of the most prestigious colleges and universities in America and abroad. Ladue students consistently gain admission to Ivy League schools just like their counter-parts at the private schools nearby. Several Ladue students have gotten perfect scores on the ACT test.

Like all public schools, Ladue now deals with tough financial issues. Having to get almost 84 percent of its funds from property taxes solely, the school administration has cut some $7 million dollars from its operating budget the past four years. Teachers have been released and programs have been cut. Many extras like summer school and camping programs are gone.

On the flip side, the district’s enrollment has grown by some 700 students starting with a spurt in 2003. Ironically one-third of the new students have come from one of three categories: other local districts; out of state and from near by private schools.

Some local breadwinners have lost their jobs or seen their salaries slashed during a painful and long downturn in the economy, forcing them to transfer their children from private to schools in the Ladue district.

Chief Financial Officer Dr. Jason Buckner is worried plenty about what he calls the “Norming” of the Ladue School District.

This is what he means. “Normally, we look at our enrollment, then decide how many teachers we will need to run these classes. If Prop 1 fails, we will have to fall into the norm of the state which dictates how large a class can be. We will just have to work with the remaining teachers that are presently on our payroll.”

Buckner says cuts always come in programs where the least students are effected. For instance, no cuts can be made in the mathematics area since "one hundred percent of our students are taking that," said Buckner. "If Prop 1 fails, all we really can do is offer basic courses," he said.

Unlike a typical business, a school district cannot make draconian cuts to its budget and keep education on the par expected by all the district parents.

The district has had $4.1 million less to work with since the 2007-08 school year.

If Prop 1 passes, the district should have enough money to make it through the next four years. Passage would allow the district to open a fifth-grade center at the new West Campus in the 2012-13 school year. District staff would get modest pay raises. Many teacher positions would be saved.

Back in the 1970s, residents in South St. Louis began to vote against all school board tax levies. Slowly, the property valuations began to drop likes stones into water in beautifully established tree-lined neighborhoods. Some areas have never recovered, even some 40 years later.

District officials are hoping that local financial support continues well past April 3 with the approval of Prop 1. Majority plus one rules in this case.

Related Topics: Commit2Ladue.org, Ladue School District, Take Back Ladue Schools, Tax Levy, and prop 1
We would love to hear your final comments on Prop 1 prior to voting April 3. Tell us in the comments.

BJones

10:15 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

mjf - if your numbers are correct, then expenditures on actual teaching are up 8% over the last four years. I know we can't ignore capital expenses and interest payments, but this paints a very different picture than I have read.
Do you have a breakdown on capital and interest over the last four years?

Reply
Comment_arrow

St. Louis is a destination

4:00 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

BJones,

2009-10 Teacher Pay Line Item 6119 $19,078,554
2011-12 Teacher Pay Line Item 6119 $16,763,421

Looks like the district has cut $2,315,133 out of "actual teaching" to balance the budget.

http://www.boarddocs.com/mo/ladue/Board.nsf/legacy-content/87522G7F0948/$FILE/FY10%20Revised%20Budget%20for%20Board%20Docs.pdf
http://docs2.ladue.k12.mo.us/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-3871/2011-12%20Revised%20Budget.pdf

Fixed Income

5:10 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

Because it is just too easy to do as you are told. Very few people can read financial statements and that includes most of the school board. That is why we need new blood on the board. We need people who are not teachers. When you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Teachers will vote for things they think will improve teaching and the lot of teachers. This board is overloaded with teachers and former teachers who have no background in finance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

St. Louis is a destination

5:17 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

FI,

This is in direct contrast to what mjf just wrote and what my numbers above prove. It seems that cutting teachers is what the district has done. Salaries are 70-80% of all school districts' budgets.

Do you suggest that the board cut electricity?

Fixed Income

5:22 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

The 10% differential in Ladue's budget equates to about $5 million. I think we can buy plenty of electricity with that. The problem we have is we have over paid everyone for the past ten years and we are now suffering the consequences of compounding. It is a buyers market for schools and instead of taking advantage of it, we want to spend more. Do you suggest that makes any sense?

Reply

St. Louis is a destination

5:41 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

Teachers are not interchangeable cogs. If you did not have teachers that changed your life, I feel sorry for you.

You have written in other threads that your children attend private school. Isn't part of the reason because you believe that there is superior instruction?

Don't superior teachers deserve to get paid?

Jimmy Goldsmith, who I think we can both agree knew more about running a business than anyone who will read this, once said, "If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys."

Reply

Parent, educator, and voter

5:46 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

The LAST people in the world I want to listen to would be Corporate America - your financial wizards! They know nothing about education, but for some reason have taken the floor as if they do. Sure - the Board needs a balance - some with good business sense and some who actually know something about education (simply having gone through school does NOT make one an expert about education!). My expenses have gone up in the past 5 years - how about yours? Gas? Electricity? Water? Paper? Computers? Toner? HEALTH INSURANCE? Well, so have those costs for the district. And guess what? So have those same costs for their employees....and those employees deserve to have pay increases to take care of the costs they have to cover. How in the world can you expect the district - with a growing enrollment - with more mandates from the feds - spend less? You need a reality check.

Reply

Fixed Income

6:50 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

Yes, my child attends a private school. Her teachers earn about 20% less than those in the Ladue system. Money does not ensure quality. Actually, I sent her there because of safety. At the time she started, I had some circumstances that caused us to be concerned about her safety. That was my chief concern. My wife and I attended public schools. I did ok. That's not the point. Parent, of course all my expenses are up. But, guess what? My earnings are down. I have not seen an extra dime. I got less than 50 basis points on my savings. I object to being asked to pay more for someone else to get more when I am getting less. I have had to alter my lifestyle to survive. I don't understand why schools think they need to be made whole while everyone else is suffering. I don't need a reality check, I need a dividend check. That's the reason so many retired people will be pouring into the polls tomorrow to vote against this. This request was a vivid example of overreaching. Had the schools come and asked for a temporary increase to cover the shortfall, we wouldn't even be here talking about it.

Reply

Leave a comment