Not Everyone in Olivette is Happy With Prop "S" for Public Safety
Aaron and Neal Novack, property owners in the Olivette Executive Parkway think the city can do much better.
It would be fair enough to say, there are some residents and business owners alike in Olivette who are strongly opposed to Proposition “S,” a public safety referendum for $9,365,000 on the August 7 primary ballot.
The purpose of Prop “S” is to fund construction of a new fire station at the present location at 9473 Olive St. and a new administration center and police headquarters building at 1101 Executive Parkway, the entrance to the parkway.
Some of the key opponents are property owners in the Olivette Executive Parkway,
Neal Novack, vice president and principal of J.E. Novack Construction Co., 1144 Olivette Executive Parkway and his brother Aaron, chief architect of the firm are not happy with the plans of the Olivette City Council.
They just feel this building, owned last by TouchPoint Autism and built in the 1980s doesn’t and won’t meet the standards of today.
“This building was built in 1986. We know construction costs and value of buildings and they (the city council) and administration could just do better,” said Aaron Novack.
They have tried previously to get their points across. They’ve had previous meetings with Olivette’s City Manager Mike McDowell.
Both brothers firmly believe the city could build a brand new building, meeting modern standards and codes at a similar cost of the $9.365 million bond issue.
Both point to Frontenac’s new city hall and public safety building as a shining example. That building, built to the tune of just a shade over $10 million houses the city administration, police and fire departments.
The Novacks have every right to voice their views. They own property in Olivette (two buildings in the Olivette Office Park) and pay over $90,000 annually in property taxes. Neil Novack resides in Olivette on Romany Park Lane; Aaron lives in Clayton.
Parking is the big issue, they both cite. The new city hall will have 66 spaces; where they feel more like 120 spaces would be adequate.
Olivette Executive Parkway just held a property owners meeting. “ I can tell you we are going to enforce our indentures strictly,” said Neal Novack. By that, indentures prohibit on-the-street parking at any time throughout the parkway,
Both think other problems exist. The building has two entrances, which will be hard to monitor, especially for evening events.
Plans call for meeting and public space in the building on the second floor, Visitors will have to go up and down hallways to use bathrooms and to enter and exit the buildings.
Even the council chamber is ripe with issues. Once the chambers are completely reconstructed, (including raising the ceiling) a support beam will partially block the audience’s view of the proceedings.
Neither brother has issues with providing for public safety overall. However, they think this whole project could be done in a more business like fashion.
“I assess property and I think paying $2,875 million to acquire the property is too much,”
said Neal Novack.
Again, parking presents a major problem. Olivette proposes to destroy fully matured trees along the eastern side of the building to add an additional 16 spaces while reducing green space.
Doug Wolfe, owner of Pro Wolfe Partners, a marketing firm in the parkway is equally as opposed. “This parkway is well noted for ample green space. Now Olivette will be taking some of that away,” said Wolfe who also resides in Olivette in the Chevy Chase subdivision.
Olivette residents have been getting robo phone calls concerning this matter. The calls are paid for by "Citizens for a Better Olivette," Neal Novack, treasurer.
“We are doing survey work and fact-finding,” said Neal Novack. The Novack name is identified on those calls as sponsors.
Both profess to not be running an active opposition campaign. “We are just talking to a lot of people to express our views,” said Neal Novack.
Cornet of Horse
8:48 am on Monday, July 30, 2012
I don't know the Novacks, but they are right... go slow on this issue. This Prop S is big money for any community and a huge decision for Olivette. Smacks of the Westminster campus perceived over-pay by Ladue School District which continues to rile up the District taxpayers. I have argued and will continue to press that the City of Olivette needs an INDEPENDENT fire and police service about as much it needs an international airport. Think what Olivette would save now and in umpteen decades forward by not having unnecessary Offical Olivette fire and po-lice chiefs, sub-chiefs with all their bells and whistles charging around like yesteryear's horse cavalry ready to do battle with the injun tribes...All of that is over and done. Think of the salary/benefits/pensions for all that staff from the jr firefighter and police recruit all the way up. Saying that prospective residents judge a community by having independent fire/police is like saying that having its own sewerage district is a selling point. Schools/Sidewalks/Parks/Zoning/Location make the difference. Olivette should lead the way and sub contract Fire and Police with the County or neighboring mini-fiefdoms. There is no rush to buy a white elephant building...and let's step back and ask if the Big O even needs circus animals at all?
MangoLassi
4:35 pm on Sunday, August 5, 2012
The Novacks are right about trying to renovate an 1980's structure and site into a municipal occupancy. That building layout, structure and site was designed to energy standards and building codes long since removed from professional bookshelves. Current seismic building standards for the structural system system alone, i.e. floors, columns and beams, have changed much since the building's design. That aspect is critical for a public building expected to remain functional after an earthquake. Conversion would never result in a building and site equal to a design that started from scratch. Do not think for a moment the published plans for the renovation is complete. It is a schematic programming space plan on how the building spaces might be programmed by use. It does not include how the structure must be upgraded, how the space HVAC requirements will be met, how the primary and emergency electrical requirements will be met and so on. All these hidden things must be changed. They require floor space and space above ceilings not currently present in the building. There would be an endless stream of design compromises -- and that is mentioning things you do not see. The compromises would be present for the life of the building.
Leif Hauser
9:14 pm on Sunday, August 5, 2012
Clayton is currently completing renovation of a 1959 building for use as its new City Hall and Police Station. Adaptive reuse of an existing structure is a significant green building design concept, to the point of earning 3 points toward LEED certification.
Let's be clear about one thing, the Novacks and their fellow property owners in Olivette Executive Parkway don't want the City to purchase a particular building: the one at 1101 Olivette Executive Parkway. That is their bottom line.